Copyright USGenNet Inc., 2025 All Rights Reserved USGenNet Data Repository Please read USGenNet Copyright Statement on this page: Transcribed and submitted by Linda Talbott for the USGenNet Data Repository http://www.us-data.org/ =========================================================================== Formatted by USGenNet Data Repository Chief Archivist, Linda Talbott All of the above information must remain when copied or downloaded. =========================================================================== The Daily Item Lynn, MA Monday, 4 August 1879 POLICE COURT Aug. 4 - JOHN HETHERINGTON, an old offender, was drunk and disorderly on Pleasant Street Court, where he lives, Saturday night, and was taken in by Officer Noyes. He tried hard to convince the Court that he hadn't been drunk, but it was n.g., and he was fined $8.65. HETHERINGTON has long been an unmitigated nuisance in the locality in which he resides. LAWRENCE LOOBY meekly admitted his imprudence in the matter of intoxicants, and was fined $7.55. LORENSTIN SNELL, another victim of the bubbling bowl, plead guilty to his offence, but wished to inquire, apparently merely as a matter of informa- tion, where he was arrested. Officer Silver informed him that he picked him up in the doorway at Brown & Oliver's, Central Avenue, at 9:30 Sunday morning. JAMES MACK plead not guilty to assault and battery on JOHN GALLAGHER. The government stated that the battle was of a mutual nature, and asked for a con- tinuance of a week, in which time it was expected GALLAGHER would be arrested. The request was granted, MACK furnishing $100 bonds for appearance next Monday. He wears a mournful eye as his fruits of the fray. JEREMIAH B. WITHERELL was arraigned by continuance for a second drunk. JERRY was sober this morning and was spruced up and looking quite nice and amiable. A. W. EDGERLY, his counsel, made an eloquent plea in behalf of his client. He said WITHERELL was no ordi- nary drunkard (which will readily be admitted) and that he had been trying to reform, but that the great labor and exhaustion of moving his goods had overcome him and he had again yielded to temptation, though at the solicitation of others and not of his own will. Counsel claimed that to send WITHERELL to the House of Correction would be a severe punishment to his family and those dependent upon him for employment, as well as himself. He claimed that WITHERELL was a thoroughly penitent man, anxious to be useful to him- self and to the community. To those who knew the pri- soner the plea was very amusing. The Court said that the evidence showed WITHERELL's conduct to have been aggravated and entirely unjustifiable, and that the law was made expressly to govern such cases. WITHERELL had been to the House of Corrections before and it was no new thing to him. The Court thereupon sentenced the wretched WITHERELL to the House of Correction for one month. He appealed, and if he behaves himself until October there may be some show of his getting off without imprisonment by paying costs. ==========================================================================